Religions don’t speak, people do
Over at Foreign Policy Watch, Jeb Koogler makes what should be an obvious point, but sadly never has been:
But religion does not speak and therefore cannot be essentialized. To talk of Islam as though it has a correct interpretation, i.e. “Islam says…”, is to begin from a poor understanding of religious hermeneutics. It is human beings who subjectively, and in a continuously changing way, interpret religious texts and provide accounts as to “correct” religious dogma and practice.
We often witness this attempt to essentialize Islam in contexts like this one: “What does Islam say about killing apostates?” This is a nonsensical question. “Islam” says nothing about the issue. Rather, the different schools of Islamic jurisprudence say something, groups of Indonesia and Saudi and Pakistani Muslims say various things, classical Sufis say other things, and so forth. We cannot speak about a definable essence — or correct meaning — of a religion with 1.2 billion adherents. We can only speak about the diversity of its interpretation and practice.
This is true of any faith. Take what may be a more familiar example: “What does Christianity say about killing apostates?” Well, Christianity doesn’t say anything about anything. There’s scripture, interpreted by both clerics and lay people. Hell, “Christianity” isn’t even clear on who is allowed to interpret it. Sure, I’d suspect that most Christians believe that you shouldn’t kill apostates, but I’m not convinced that’s some universal belief, forget about being “said by Christianity.”
The church I grew up in was, by and large, part of the fundamentalist tradition. It was even a part of the Independent Fundamentalist Churches of America, the association that, I guess, served as the “denomination” (think “Anarchists’ Club”). But, sometime in the 1990s, there was a split—a schism between people who believed that Jesus was always the Son of God, and those who believed that Jesus became the Son of God when he was born. Seriously.
So, how can people think that there’s a possibility that “Islam” teaches anything, any more than “Christianity” or “Judaism” teaches anything?
Related posts:
Leave a comment
Latest Tweets
- +1 http://t.co/7uzEZhIS 2012-03-09
- What kind of drunk are you getting tonight? http://t.co/FlxwgGsY #sheepedrunk 2012-03-08
- In case you don't know why everybody's joking about hugs today: http://t.co/aXgKG5xi 2012-03-08
- Climate change migration is beginning: http://t.co/AdQetwAx 2012-03-08
- More updates...
Sections
Latest Posts
- Thanks and farewell
- On a bike
- Won’t somebody please think of the members of Congress?
- Hump-Day Song of the Week: Shuffle by Bombay Bicycle Club
- The Agenda
- More on those robots that are going to destroy us all
- They (didn’t) take our jobs
- Well, maybe Mikhail Prokorov has a future in rap music
- Yo, is this racist?
- The Agenda
V+V Elsewhere
V+V Recommends
- Alas! A Blog
- alicublog
- Attackerman
- AV Club
- Cogitamus
- Ezra Klein
- FiveThirtyEight
- FlowingData
- Food Court Lunch
- Gin and Tacos
- James Fallows
- Jared Bernstein
- Lawyers, Guns and Money
- Market Urbanism
- Matt Yglesias
- Obsidian Wings
- Passion of the Weiss
- Paul Kedrosky's Infectious Greed
- Planet Money
- Political Animal
- RJ Eskow
- Sadly, No!
- Slacktivist
- Smitten Kitchen
- Ta-Nehisi Coates
- The Bobblespeak Translations
- The Bugle
- The Bureau Chiefs
- The Diane Rehm Show
- The Duck of Minerva
- The Esquire Politics Blog
- thought for food
- Whiskey Fire
- Yo, Is This Racist?
Advertisements
Archives
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010





